Equilibrium Preservation and Finite Memory Bias in Fractional Monod Chemostat Models
Downloads
Abstract
Fractional chemostat models distinguish transient memory from the equilibrium geometry of microbial growth, but a truncated numerical history can alter both. We analyze a two-state Monod chemostat with Caputo derivatives and develop exact diagnostics for this distinction. The positive equilibrium meets washout at the order-independent dilution . Its linearization has no characteristic root in the closed right half-plane for any pair of orders in , while a common order also yields an exact Mittag–Leffler balance for substrate-equivalent mass. For an explicit Grünwald–Letnikov recurrence applied to uncorrected states, the missing Caputo initial correction produces immediate drift from a nonzero equilibrium. A finite cutoff adds a stationary loss whose exact coefficient is derived. The resulting Monod branch equation is quadratic and may introduce two artificial collision points; its upper displacement admits an exact decomposition. At a fixed retained time horizon, this loss persists under grid refinement. Independent deterministic computations using corrected full-history Grünwald–Letnikov and Adams predictor–corrector methods verify equilibrium preservation, exact-solution accuracy, and decreasing cross-method discrepancies. For the stated kinetics and mixed orders , the uncorrected upper collision approaches h⁻¹ when a 7.5-hour history is retained, rather than the continuous value h⁻¹. Correcting initialization alone also leaves a nonzero truncation floor in scalar relaxation. These results provide a reproducible basis for evaluating washout detection and fractional-order estimation without attributing numerical memory loss to biological mechanisms.
Keywords
Fractional chemostat Caputo derivative Equilibrium preservation Memory truncation Monod kinetics Numerical verificationReferences (30)
- [1] Monod, J. (1949). The growth of bacterial cultures. Annual Review of Microbiology, 3, 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103
- [2] Smith, H. L., & Waltman, P. (1995). The theory of the chemostat: Dynamics of microbial competition (Vol. 13). Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805214/70278/sample/9780521470278ws.pdf
- [3] Harmand, J., Lobry, C., Rapaport, A., & Sari, T. (2017). The chemostat: Mathematical theory of microorganism cultures (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119437215
- [4] Caputo, M. (1967). Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent—II. Geophysical Journal International, 13(5), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x
- [5] Diethelm, K. (2010). The analysis of fractional differential equations: An application-oriented exposition using differential operators of Caputo type. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2_8
- [6] Aris, N. A. M., & Jamaian, S. S. (2021). Dynamical analysis of fractional-order chemostat model. AIMS Biophysics, 8(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2021014
- [7] Ma, X., Bai, Z., & Sun, S. (2022). Stability and bifurcation control for a fractional-order chemostat model with time delays and incommensurate orders. AIMS Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 20(1), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023020
- [8] Zhu, H., Peng, Y., Li, Y., & Zeng, C. (2023). Forward dynamics and memory effect in a fractional order chemostat minimal model with non-monotonic growth. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, 16(10), 2749-2764. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2023019
- [9] Elgindy, K. T. (2026). Sustainable water treatment through fractional-order chemostat modeling with sliding memory and periodic boundary conditions: A mathematical framework for clean water and sanitation. Fractal and Fractional, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10010004
- [10] Duan, X., & Pilyugin, S. S. (2025). A chemostat model with variable dilution rate due to biofilm growth. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 85(5), 2295–2317. https://doi.org/10.1137/24M1704890
- [11] Zeinadini, M., & Namjoo, M. (2017). Approximation of fractional-order Chemostat model with nonstandard finite diff erence scheme. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 46(3), 469–482.
- [12] Matignon, D. (1996). Stability results for fractional differential equations with applications to control processing. Computational Engineering in Systems Applications (pp. 963-968). Cprnell University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2581881
- [13] Brandibur, O., Garrappa, R., & Kaslik, E. (2021). Stability of systems of fractional-order differential equations with Caputo derivatives. Mathematics, 9(8), 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080914
- [14] Brandibur, O., & Kaslik, E. (2021). Exact stability and instability regions for two-dimensional linear autonomous multi-order systems of fractional-order differential equations. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 24(1), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2021-0010
- [15] Diethelm, K., Siegmund, S. & Tuan, H. . (2017). Asymptotic behavior of solutions of linear multi-order fractional differential systems. Fractional calculus and applied analysis, 20(5), 1165–1195. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2017-0062
- [16] Lubich, C. (1986). Discretized fractional calculus. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 17(3), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1137/0517050
- [17] Diethelm, K., Ford, N. J., & Freed, A. D. (2002). A predictor-corrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Dynamics, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016592219341
- [18] Diethelm, K., Ford, N. J., & Freed, A. D. (2004). Detailed error analysis for a fractional Adams method. Numerical Algorithms, 36(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NUMA.0000027736.85078.be
- [19] Garrappa, R. (2018). Numerical solution of fractional differential equations: A survey and a software tutorial. Mathematics, 6(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6020016
- [20] Li, C., & Zeng, F. (2015). Numerical methods for fractional calculus. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18503
- [21] Schädle, A., López-Fernández, M., & Lubich, C. (2006). Fast and oblivious convolution quadrature. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1137/050623139
- [22] Jiang, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Fast evaluation of the Caputo fractional derivative and its applications to fractional diffusion equations. Communications in Computational Physics, 21(3), 650–678. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2016-0136
- [23] Jin, B., Lazarov, R., & Zhou, Z. (2016). An analysis of the L1 scheme for the subdiffusion equation with nonsmooth data. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 36(1), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/dru063
- [24] Stynes, M., O’Riordan, E., & Gracia, J. L. (2017). Error analysis of a finite difference method on graded meshes for a time-fractional diffusion equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 55(2), 1057–1079. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1082329
- [25] Garrappa, R. (2015). Numerical evaluation of two and three parameter Mittag-Leffler functions. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 53(3), 1350–1369. https://doi.org/10.1137/140971191
- [26] Brugnano, L., Burrage, K., Burrage, P., & Iavernaro, F. (2024). A spectrally accurate step-by-step method for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 99(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-024-02517-1
- [27] Raue, A., Kreutz, C., Maiwald, T., Bachmann, J., Schilling, M., Klingmüller, U., & Timmer, J. (2009). Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics, 25(15), 1923–1929. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358
- [28] Bellman, R., & Åström, K. J. (1970). On structural identifiability. Mathematical Biosciences, 7(3–4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(70)90132-X
- [29] Söderström, T. (2007). Errors-in-variables methods in system identification. Automatica, 43(6), 939–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2006.11.025
- [30] Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705