Research Article

Latency Aware Metaheuristics for Earthquake Early Warning Network Design

Authors

  • Mahmoud Alimoradi * Department of Computer Engineering, Shafagh Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon, Iran.
  • Eisa Abdolmaleki Department of Mathematics, To. C., Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran.
  • Hashem Saberi Najafi Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Applied Mathematics, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.
  • Hadi Faghihmaleki Department of Civil Engineering, Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon, Mazandaran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48314/ceti.v3i3.94

Abstract

Earthquake Early Warning(EEW) network design couples a physical deadline with uncertain sensing, processing, and communication delays. An improved optimization score is useful only if it increases the probability that an actionable alert arrives before the relevant shaking. This paper develops a latency based interpretation of metaheuristic network design through a critical literature synthesis, a precise timing model, and a reproducible placement experiment. The model treats station reports as concurrent arrivals, represents confirmation by an order statistic, and includes central processing, delivery, action time, and station outages. We establish monotonicity under a fixed exogenous latency model, exhibit the failure of submodularity under multiple station confirmation, and specialize a finite family concentration bound to distinguish optimization error from sampling error. Five search methods are evaluated in six constructed planning cases using 900 runs and 1.62 million charged objective evaluations. Complete enumeration of 405,273 feasible placements supplies training optima for every case, and independent scenario sets assess generalization. Simulated Annealing(SA) and restarted swap search attain every small case optimum in all 90 runs per method, whereas performance becomes more variable in the larger cases. For prespecified placements, adding four seconds to the event path reduces weighted timely coverage by 9.33–10.71 percentage points, exceeding the largest median training gap among the tested solvers. The findings support deadline based evaluation and offline optimization, while remaining conditional on the stated geometry and delay distributions. They establish neither a universal algorithm ranking nor operational performance for a deployed warning network.

Keywords

Earthquake early warning Sensor placement Latency Metaheuristic optimization Scenario analysis Reproducibility
References (33)
  1. [1] Allen, R. M., & Melgar, D. (2019). Earthquake early warning: Advances, scientific challenges, and societal needs. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47(1), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457

  2. [2] Minson, S. E., Meier, M. A., Baltay, A. S., Hanks, T. C., & Cochran, E. S. (2018). The limits of earthquake early warning: Timeliness of ground motion estimates. Science Advances, 4(3), eaaq0504. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0504

  3. [3] Meier, M. A., Kodera, Y., Böse, M., Chung, A., Hoshiba, M., Cochran, E., …, & Heaton, T. (2020). How often can earthquake early warning systems alert sites with high-intensity ground motion? Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2), e2019JB017718. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017718

  4. [4] Oth, A., Böse, M., Wenzel, F., Köhler, N., & Erdik, M. (2010). Evaluation and optimization of seismic networks and algorithms for earthquake early warning the case of Istanbul (Turkey). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 115(B10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007447

  5. [5] Stankiewicz, J., Bindi, D., Oth, A., & Parolai, S. (2013). Designing efficient earthquake early warning systems: case study of Almaty, Kazakhstan. Journal of Seismology, 17(4), 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-013-9381-4

Article Metrics

How to Cite

Alimoradi, M., Abdolmaleki, E., Saberi Najafi, H., & Faghihmaleki, H. (2026). Latency Aware Metaheuristics for Earthquake Early Warning Network Design. Computational Engineering and Technology Innovations, 3(3), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.48314/ceti.v3i3.94

Similar Articles

1-10 of 62

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.