Nature-Inspired Optimization Across the Mine Value Chain: A Critical Review
Downloads
Abstract
Nature-inspired optimization offers flexible search mechanisms for mining decisions that combine discrete schedules, nonlinear process responses and competing resource demands. Its practical value, however, depends on the formulation being solved and the evidence supporting the reported improvement. This critical narrative review examines these methods across fragmentation, extraction and blending, transportation, mineral processing, water management, and waste and closure planning. It connects foundational search mechanisms with selected mining studies and distinguishes predictive accuracy, improvement within a mathematical model, and operational validation. The synthesis identifies representation, constraint handling, cross-stage coupling, uncertainty and computational accounting as the principal dimensions of a defensible comparison. A compact mathematical framework makes material balance, recovery, resource limits and residue accumulation explicit. An exactly enumerated, dimensionless example then exposes the consequences of these couplings without claiming empirical algorithm superiority. Of 189 configurations, 14 satisfy all constraints and eight are nondominated in profit, energy and water. A policy that minimizes the fragmentation component at a fixed throughput violates the downstream energy limit, while an alternative fragmentation mode restores feasibility and improves the profit score. Capacity and penalty analyses further show that a higher unconstrained objective can reflect constraint violation and that the penalty weight needed to exclude infeasible optima depends on the instance and normalization. The review concludes with a comparison protocol, elementary arithmetic checks for rank-based results, and a research agenda centered on transparent hybridization, independent process validation and transferable benchmarks. Nature-inspired search is most persuasive when its computational mechanisms are matched to mine-chain structure and its benefits remain traceable to feasible, reproducible decisions.
Keywords
Mine value chain Nature-inspired optimization Metaheuristics Stochastic mine planning Multiobjective optimization Constraint handling Reproducible benchmarkingReferences (31)
- [1] Newman, A. M., Rubio, E., Caro, R., Weintraub, A., & Eurek, K. (2010). A review of operations research in mine planning. Interfaces, 40(3), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1090.0492
- [2] Goodfellow, R., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2017). Simultaneous stochastic optimization of mining complexes and mineral value chains. Mathematical Geosciences, 49(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9680-3
- [3] Dimitrakopoulos, R., & Lamghari, A. (2022). Simultaneous stochastic optimization of mining complexes-mineral value chains: An overview of concepts, examples and comparisons. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 36(6), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2022.2065730
- [4] Darling, P. (2011). SME mining engineering handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration. https://books.google.com/books?id=5uq-kdfHLWUC&printsec=frontcover
- [5] Glover, F. W., & Kochenberger, G. A. (2003). Handbook of metaheuristics. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/b101874
- [6] Ye, D. G. L., & Yinyu, A. (2016). Linear and nonlinear programming. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18842-3
- [7] Tan, J., Melkoumian, N., Harvey, D., & Akmeliawati, R. (2025). Nature inspired solutions for sustainable mining: applications of NIAs, swarm robotics, and other biomimicry-based technologies. Biomimetics, 10(3), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10030181
- [8] Lin, J., Asad, M. W. A., Topal, E., & Chang, P. (2026). Metaheuristic approaches for open pit mine production scheduling: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2026.2674140
- [9] Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle SWARM optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95 international conference on neural networks (pp. 1942–1948). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
- [10] Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996). Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 26(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484436
- [11] Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
- [12] Kalyanmoy, D. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
- [13] Chicoisne, R., Espinoza, D., Goycoolea, M., Moreno, E., & Rubio, E. (2012). A new algorithm for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem. Operations Research, 60(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1050
- [14] Montiel, L., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2015). Optimizing mining complexes with multiple processing and transportation alternatives: An uncertainty-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.002
- [15] Yaakoubi, Y., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2023). Learning to schedule heuristics for the simultaneous stochastic optimization of mining complexes. Computers & Operations Research, 159, 106349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106349
- [16] Guo, J., Zhao, Z., Zhao, P., & Chen, J. (2024). Prediction and optimization of open-pit mine blasting based on intelligent algorithms. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5609. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135609
- [17] Amankwaa-Kyeremeh, B., McCamley, C., Ehrig, K., & Asamoah, R. K. (2024). Multiobjective optimisation of flotation variables using controlled-NSGA-II and paretosearch. Resources, 13(11), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13110157
- [18] Hasidi, O., El Alaoui-Chrifi, M. A., Chahid, R., Qazdar, A., Qassimi, S., Zaizi, F. Z., …, & Bendaouia, A. (2024). Data driven system for intelligent monitoring and optimization of froth flotation circuits using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Journal of Process Control, 137, 103198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103198
- [19] Guimaraes, V. F., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2026). Simultaneous stochastic optimisation of mining complexes: Integrating waste management and progressive reclamation with encapsulation. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2026.2654147
- [20] Lones, M. A. (2014). Metaheuristics in nature inspired algorithms. Proceedings of the companion publication of the 2014 annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (pp. 1419–1422). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598394.2609841
- [21] Sörensen, K. (2015). Metaheuristics the metaphor exposed. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12001
- [22] Deb, K. (2000). An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186(2–4), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00389-8
- [23] Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Huang, Y., & Ge, S. (2025). A low-carbon scheduling method based on improved ant colony algorithm for underground electric transportation vehicles. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 11(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01775-8
- [24] Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhu, D., Bo, L., Yang, S., Yue, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Mine water cooperative optimal scheduling based on improved genetic algorithm. Heliyon, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27289
- [25] United Nations Environment Programme, International Council on Mining and Metals, Principles for Responsible Investment. (2020). Global industry standard on tailings management. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/36139
- [26] Beiranvand, V., Hare, W., & Lucet, Y. (2017). Best practices for comparing optimization algorithms. Optimization and Engineering, 18(4), 815–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-017-9366-1
- [27] Bartz Beielstein, T., Doerr, C., Berg, D. van den, Bossek, J., Chandrasekaran, S., Eftimov, T., …, & Weise, T. (2020). Benchmarking in optimization: Best practice and open issues. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.03488
- [28] Dolan, E. D., & Moré, J. J. (2002). Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Mathematical Programming, 91(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070100263
- [29] Demšar, J. (2006). Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(01), 1–30. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v7/demsar06a.html
- [30] Garcia, S., & Herrera, F. (2008). An extension on" statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets" for all pairwise comparisons. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(12), 1–18. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume9/garcia08a/garcia08a.pdf
- [31] Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893